The peer-review process is double blinded; that is, the reviewers do not know who the authors of the manuscript are, and the authors do not have access to the information of who the peer reviewers are. We arranged this method consider manuscript tracking system by get title page (contain full authors information) and manuscript file (without any authors information). All processes in OUACSCE manuscript tracking system followed by email between all involved roles and all steps.
Article Submission: The article is submitted to the OUACSCE by the corresponding or submitting author. Typically, this is done using an online submission system.
Structural Assessment: The Editor in Chief compares the article’s structure and organization to the journal’s Author Guidelines to ensure that it has all the appropriate sections and stylizations. Currently, there is no assessment of the article’s quality.
Editor Review and Processing: Selected Editor reviews the article to ensure that it is acceptable for the journal and that it is sufficiently unique and intriguing. Otherwise, the article may be dismissed without further evaluation.
Plagiarism Checkup: The article is examined for similarity results by Systemantiplagiat.ro software at this stage; if the similarity results are less than 20%, the article is accepted for reviewer assignment; otherwise, the article is rejected owing to similarity findings.
Reviewer Invites: The Editor-in-Chief extends invitations to people he or she thinks would be good reviewers. If necessary, further invitations are sent out when answers are received, until the needed number of acceptances is reached (two accepted reviewer decision).
Invitation Response: Potential reviewers evaluate the invitation considering their own knowledge, conflicts of interest, and availability. They can then choose to accept or decline.
The review is completed: The reviewer schedules time to read the material many times. The initial read is used to develop an impression of the work. If severe flaws are discovered at this point, the reviewer may decide to reject the article without further investigation. Otherwise, they will read the text many times more, taking notes to compile a comprehensive point-by-point evaluation. The review is then sent to the journal, along with a suggestion to accept or reject it – or a request for change (typically marked as major or minor) before it is reviewed.
Editor of the Journal Evaluates the Reviews: Before reaching a final decision, Selected Editor of the Journal evaluates the returned review. If the reviews are significantly different, the editor may request a third reviewer to provide a second viewpoint before reaching a decision.
Send Status email: First and foremost, the Editor-in-Chief sends the author a decision email that includes any relevant reviewer comments. The author does not know who the reviewer(s) is.
Author Submits Revised Manuscript: The author should make the modifications requested by the reviewer and highlight them in red or yellow shadow.
Final Decision: If the article is accepted, the author must pay the publishing charge, if there is one, and the piece will be sent to the page designer, who will subsequently submit it to the publisher.